Simp Chat Staryuuki - Discussion Thread

Just a reminder, Onlyfans also banned explicit content when it started
(I'm not saying at all that Yuki is going to do it)
 
Honestly the only thing I hope for is that they do earlicking XD, something more hardcore in the photos is a lie, she doesn't do it, especially with the money they'll give her just for Instagram-style photos.
 
that change lasted them a week :LUL then they realized how much money they'd lose and reverted it
 
If she stopped having so many simps she'd probably have crossed the threshold into something more hardcore already, plus she's pretty old now, almost 30, her prime is passing, she'll soon have to move on to something more or her money sources will go down the drain, and knowing the potential she has she won't allow that, because by making hotter content she'd probably have 100 times more simps and could make way more money still. That good girl story only she believes (and some simps)
 
yuuki another scammer in the game, sooner or later shw will end up selling bikini or underwear sets as premium content over the subscription, she kinda hot vut not quite, hope to see at least a face covered fuck video 🫠
 
maybe fanova is a way to get in touch with dudes to fuck without paying much tax, just direct transfers, it's hard, way too hard to believe that house is paid for with donations alone, she has simps but it's doubtful 🤔
 
She's got like 4 donors who won't let her drop below 1400 subs, it's been like that for years. It's weird to see someone spend part of their life working to support, directly or indirectly, someone who only says hi to them :peepoShrug:, mysteries of human nature. It would be good if the government (of any country) regulated that kind of behavior exactly like it does with betting sites or casinos. Supporting is normal, but for so long, and to the point where it's become a personal need :monkaW:
 
There are few of them but they donate way too much. If those people agreed not to donate, or not donate as much, for just one month, they'd notice the pattern. When donations drop below a certain threshold and stay there for several days, streams start to get more skin and a few "slips" here and there. The bad part is that the fact that she notices them, says their name and greets them on every donation has already created a psychological need they can hardly get out of, it became an addiction. As I said in another reply, governments should tell platforms to regulate that kind of behavior
 
as expected, her fanova is the blandest thing on the planet

the only hope is that a good number of people subscribed this first month expecting content suggestive enough to choke the chicken, saw how mediocre the content is and unsubscribed. maybe then she'll feel like showing more..
 
Let's see, a lot of people are confusing platform freedom with the creator's obligation, but I get where the frustration comes from.

For years on Twitch we saw the version "repressed" by moderation: costumes like Shampoo with the ultra-short dress, but where the thrill got killed instantly because you could see the seams of the sports shorts she wore to shield herself from bans. Those shorts weren't clothing, they were a shield so they wouldn't shut down her channel.

When Fannova opened, the logical expectation of the people who paid for the subscription was to see exactly that same cosplay, but without Twitch's censorship filter; that is, swapping the safety shorts for a thong or lingerie peeking out during a little dance without breaking the "no nudity" rule. They expected her to use the freedom of the paywall to take off the safety patch.

If she decides to keep the defensive shorts and the same aseptic cleanliness on a paid site, it's normal that people feel like they're watching an expensive Instagram. But the reality is simple: the paywall gave her the freedom to show more if she wants, not the obligation to do it. Yuuki decides how far she stretches the line, and whoever isn't happy with that limit just has to cancel the subscription.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top