Simp Chat ASMR Puffin - Discussion Thread

Someone subscribed last month would have gotten that 3dio video of her showing some ass and that topless one that's a counterpart to it so it's not like the last month has had nothing. I do think she needs the other parts of whatever series she does to have more going on in them visually. Also some one-offs like try-ons or body focused videos wouldn't hurt.
 
All her videos are in 4k right? Am I the only one unable to watch them on tablet because of this? It keeps unsyncing audio and freezing
 
If your tablet can play 4K content it could be dependent on the video player. I always prefer 1080p for the smaller file size and the fact my phone can't play 4K. People can actually get lower resolutions of it if they wanted to.
 
She has "obvious limits" but nobody is asking her to expand them. Nobody is going "Hey Puffin, shove a dildo in your ass for me".
The problem is that most of her content is no where near her "obvious limit" but rather very far below it. Stop being purposefuly obtuse.
If we were to quantify her "obvious limit" as a 5/10 on the scale of pornographic explicitness, nobody is asking her to make a 6/10.
We're frustrated that most of her videos are 1-3/10 and only rarely makes a 5/10.
Her production is pretty regular though, and she should get props for that because it hasn't always been so and I know she has struggled with procrastination and keeping to schedule going way back.
Her content and customs on Patreon back before OF would often run 3 months behind schedule. I'm actually shocked she's making such frequent content.
 
The real question is how many people HERE actually sub to her, actually pay for her content? No way to tell, but I feel like those who are paying should be complaining not the freeloaders.
"💗 lewd / semi-nude
💗 photosets, roleplays, pure asmr trigger videos
💗 multiple posts per week
💗 high quality audio geared towards asmr
💗 no PPV on feed, only the occasional DM if you are interested"
True. I don't know why people are upset about this comment. It's like going to Burger King and expecting a Big Mac.
 
We can complain about whatever we want. What right do you have to tell us what we can or cannot complain about? BTW, if you didn't notice... you're complaining about us complaining. So saying we shouldn't complain is kinda hypocritical. We all have freedom of speech and can speak our minds about whatever we want to. Guy over her trying to complain-shame us smh
 
rather than bite the hand that feeds you be grateful they even share.. stop acting entitled like a wellfare person that contributes nothing
 
Except I'm not complaining, I'm criticising the entitled begging on a free forum.
"We all have freedom of speech and can speak our minds about whatever we want to."
I guess Puffin also has the rights to post whatever content she wants, so you shouldn't whine like babies. 🤷🏻‍♂️
 
You're saying that giving an opinion about content is the same as biting the hand of those who bought it and shared it? Wow. no bro, there's a huge difference. We're grateful to the guy who posted here.
Yes, Puffin absolutely has the right to create whatever content she wants. But that doesn't negate anyone else's right to give their opinion on her content
 
"Semi-nude" means topless, so this entire argument is stupid.
She has never shown her "genitals" which is what "full-nude" means.
I don't know what point some of you are trying to make. She has always described her content the same way and the nudity shown in that content aligns perfectly with that description. Nobody is trying to pressure her into showing her pussy and asshole (I mean it'd be nice, but that's not the complaint).
The complaints are about the percentage of content that is lewd vs semi-nude.
An anology to help some of you understand better:
Hooters (Lewd) > Topless Stripclub (Semi-nude) > Full Nude Strip Club.
She advertised her content (correctly) as Lewd and Semi-nude. The issue, whether you agree with it or not, is how much is lewd vs semi-nude.
 
i misread, the entitled begging when they dont contribute is bs, but she is entitled to post what she in comfortable with, if it works it works if it doesnt she stops.. but women that post lewd content are nyphos if they admit it or not
 
I think the question this whole “Arguement” comes down to is this …
If you’re a subscriber to her content,
Do you want NO content for 3 weeks, then a 20 min topless video? Or …
Do you want 3 weeks of boring fully clothed ASMR videos, then 1 topless video? Or …
Do you want a weekly or bi-weekly video of “softcore” teasing where she goes from clothed to topless, like most of her current PPVs?
I’d prefer option 3.
 
"Complaining is not an opinion. While an opinion is a personal belief or evaluation, a complaint is an expression of dissatisfaction aimed at registering a grievance, often to prompt a change, correction, or action."
Your complaint isn't an opinion. It's whining on a free forum.
 
TLDR;
People subscribed to "ASMR Puffin"s OF or Fansly paying for her content are entitled and free to complain to "ASMR Puffin". OTOH this is a forum and this a discussion thread, so we are entitled and free to complain about "ASMR Puffin".
She should have 2 tiers, with and without nudity. Regardless of having tiers or if 2 or 4 videos, she should be consistent.
"People just have no patience" (Orange8920)
--- Long text :KEKWlaugh: ---
I don't know why people complicate everything so much.
First of all, we are having this discussion, because some people here like her, therefore whatever she does is good and defend her "she can do whatever she wants". If it were Amouranth or iJenz, nobody cares if people complain "she is a scammer".
Second, people subscribed to "ASMR Puffin"s OF or Fansly paying for her content are entitled and free to complain to "ASMR Puffin". OTOH this is a forum and this a discussion thread, so we are entitled and free to complain about "ASMR Puffin".
This is the important part that the "don't complain!" side is missing. This is an arm chair discussion about expectations, wishes and trajectory of "ASMR Puffin"s content, not a pitchfork meeting. Nobody is planning a campaign outside of her house demanding her simps to stop paying for her content.
The "you can't complain if you don't pay" is also a very bad idea, that would mean nobody can have an opinion and express it. I can complain that a BMW is expensive without owning one. For me that is an opinion based on my facts, the fact being that I'm poor and can't afford it hahaha, therefore its expensive for me. But I cannot complain about the value of a BMW if I don't own one or know the specifics, only because I cannot afford it, doesn't mean I cannot see that all the bells and whistles it has are worth the money.
We don't pay, then we should not complain to "ASMR Puffin", that is fair. But through different means we can watch the videos (like if a friend shared their BMW with us), therefore we can have an opinion and eventually complain to the friend "Nah, the BMW is not worth it". Without having to pay for one myself.
Coming back to "ASMR Puffin". I think two comments from the whole nonsense discussion are worth bringing back:
1. People just have no patience (Orange8920)
2. Have 2 Tiers for content (Relitando)
My problem with some content creators is two-fold, their lack of consistency and that they want to have their cake and eat it too.
The cake thing is the simplest one. They want the money, so instead of providing one good video per month or 2, they produce 10 videos and then get angry because people complain that the quality went to shit. Or complain that they are burned out. Or... or...
iJenz is the perfect example, from Twitch streamer, to multi channel streamer, to 24 hours streamer, to fanova (some shit website like fansly).
"ASMR Puffin" wants her cake. If she puts in the bio "I upload 4 videos per month, but only sometimes 1 of those will be semi-nude maybe", not as many people would subscribe. The moment she writes "multiple posts per week" and "lewd / semi-nude", statistically the expectation is that at least 1 day of the week it will be semi-nude content (photos or videos). If its only once per month, welp... she didn't lie, she published semi-nude content and made multiple posts per week. And that's why some countries have laws about marketing, because it's not only what the words mean, but what the consumer expects from those.
It feels like "Maddy ASMR" only does topless ASMR videos, some people might say its boring, but that's what she offers in her OF bio. If I want to watch her lewd or normal ASMR I would go to youtube. But if she starts doing 90-10 in OF def people will complain.
And since complaining without solutions is boring, to get rid of this situation, I think what SareneWild does is a good approach (Relitandos comment). She can have two tiers, one with and one without nudity. Done, no more complaints... except for the next point.
Consistency. Skepticalpickle is a bit better now, but she was constantly missing deadlines, that means people would have to subscribe another month to get the content they had already paid for.
Right now "ASMR Puffin" can argue, as in her post, that we are not entitled to semi-nude content, that "ASMR Puffin" is an artist and does whatever her creativity tells her. That is fine, but then she should be explicit about that in the bio, or be consistent about the content produced. This is her job, not just an afterthought.
In a real job, if you don't deliver you are fired. But in the gooning world, since we all have our brains toasted, we pay even if they don't deliver.
Having tiers so that people are aware of what they are getting and being consistent so people get what was promised is the only thing I can think of, that would get rid of this discussion. If it's 4 videos per month? fine. 2? fine. 10 videos and 1 semi-nude? fine. Just deliver and that's it. We all happy.
Solution, it's like going to the gym. If you can only do 2 push-ups every day, then only do 2, but do them good. Doing 10 shaky semi push-ups doesn't help anybody. And if tomorrow you feel strong enough to do 5, then do 5. But promising 50 push-ups and doing only 8 and wrong, it only leads to injuring yourself.
From my part, I don't really care about how often she does semi-nudes hahaha. I just like the discussion hahaha. I'm a DataHoarder, I follow a lot of threads, download the content and save it somewhere. I'm not so invested on her to get disappointed or angry, at some point "ASMR Puffin" thread will pop up in the notifications, I will visit the thread, download the video and archive it. If the creators publish once per month, or if nobody shares their content or whatever, I sometimes don't even notice.
 
We’re not saying she has to show her pussy, or herself putting in a dildo or anything like that (though if she did… that’d be awesome).
The whole point of this, and why she even had to make a post, is that part 4 was super mediocre compared to part 3. Like, the first two videos were just “meh”, the third one was good, and the fourth went right back to being meh, that’s why we’re saying this.
Honestly, I don’t care if she does one PPV video a month, as long as 2 out of the 3 videos before it are like a 7 or 8 out of 10, so the PPV feels like a 10 out of 10. If the videos leading up to it are just okay, then it’s fair to say something, right? We’re not trying to insult her or make her feel bad, always being respectful obviously. And remember, people pay for her stuff; if it was free we wouldn’t expect much or anything at all, but it’s not free.
That said, about part 5: her showing her face while giving head, and doing it really well too, first time she’s ever shown her face doing that, totally made up for how little she showed in the sex scene. All in all it was a great final part, I really liked it.
 
Another thing that is being overlooked here, that I've pointed out before, is that I believe strongly that Puffin is a dominant woman. She is not submissive at all, she is not a "pleaser". Giving people "what they want" is probably inherently antithetical to her nature.
On some level I think our dissatisfaction is a feature, not a bug.
I think even more than "filler content" or "modesty" or "artistic license" being the reason to withhold nudity.... It's actually the act of withholding something from us that is itself the point.
 
That latest post is as if she remembered she has an ass as she hasn't shown it much lately
 
I think the latest video is optimal for a non-roleplay video but the stockings fucking suck and make a potential 8/10 video into 6/10 because they actively detract from her ass. Like never wear that shit again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top