Simp Chat Willow.Trie Discussion

When these sites keep having "leaks" where all that personal data ends up out there and doxing people, it's clear the intention isn't security. Especially when that data can be legally "bought" and then sold through loopholes such as another entity buying out the one that has said "We won't abuse your data", because the new owner was never under those same claims. Discord for example, say Microsoft bought them out. Discord says "we will never sell your data, but you must verify to see nsfw content". Disc just sits and does its thing for years, building archives of users. It cannot legally sell any of it, so maybe "leaks" happen. Later Microsoft, or someone else, buys out Discord, and suddenly all that data can be sold because there are no restrictions on the new owners.

For a real blackpill moment, ask yourself how many new companies set up with the intent of keeping users' data safe were long con games like this the entire time, running patience plays for years to build enough data to later "buy" with a shell company and then sell as was always going to be the plan.

And remember, this always starts with pearl clutching. It's to "save the children", despite numbers involved in examples there rarely dropping.
 
Not sure if you read my reply as me disagreeing with you or adding onto my comment, but I completely agree with you, hence why I said, “I'm not going to hand over ID to a gooner site just to use OnlyFans.”

Your point is 100% valid and expands on mine. Nobody should have to hand a company, especially a porn company, their government ID or biometrics just to buy porn. The fact that simply saying “I'm over 18” isn't enough anymore is genuinely staggering. It's privacy invasion being pushed through under the banner of “child safety,” which is complete BS.

Children can't even buy things on OnlyFans anyway. Children's bank accounts are prohibited from adult sites, and you can't enter into a credit agreement until you're 18. So I'm not really sure what OnlyFans is trying to achieve here.

Countries like Australia, New Zealand and the UK have introduced some pretty oppressive age ID laws, so if OnlyFans is legally required to implement verification there, I understand why they're doing it (even if I don't agree). They don't really have a choice. What I don't understand is why they're rolling it out site wide for every country, including those without the legal requirement.

If I had to guess, part of it is probably because OnlyFans is UK based, and the UK seems to be leading the way in pushing these increasingly invasive age verification laws. And frankly, the underlying motivation of simply “protecting children” is bullshit.

I've also looked into some of the companies involved in age ID verification, and there have already been data breaches in this wider ecosystem. 5CA, for example, a third party customer support company used by OnlyFans, suffered a 2025 breach involving sensitive information (ID's, etc.) submitted during age related appeals.

Even without breaches, there's the issue of what happens to this data afterwards like you stated in your reply. You're trusting these companies not to retain it unnecessarily, share it, sell it, use it for AI or other purposes, or hand it over to governments or other organisations, which we know they're 100% going to do.

In the long run, this will hurt OnlyFans and other adult content platforms financially too. I've already started seeing creators say their revenue has dropped over the last few months (since the rollout began), although the wider global economy obviously isn't helping. Users don't want to submit ID and biometrics just to goon, that's another barrier between creators and their paying audience.

So yeah. Very weird times to be a gooner.
 
I could/should have clarified my post more to be on-side with you given you posted this bit;
 
Yeah, I knew that was coming up, but i thought she could have used the cash prior to the engagement....so likely nothing for another 2 weeks.
 
Back
Top