Simp Chat TingTingASMR

It’s insane the discussion thread starts with those three pictures. I know she teased it a bit but I genuinely didn’t think this day would ever come.
That said content is a bit too rich for my blood. There’s a five minute ASMR ear eating video her agency tried to sell me. I think it’s different to the lollipop one in the thread as it’s a different length.
They wouldn’t share any screenshots or previews so no idea what outfit she’s wearing or how the camera’s positioned.
They want $100 so sadly I’m out.
 
The higher price makes sense given most of the pics and some of the vids are professional studio shoots, but still, geez.
A simple lollipop roleplay with a few kisses shouldn't be that pricy on top of the 15$ monthly tag.
 
She would actually be a millionaire overnight if her agency was transparent about what they were selling and were more reasonable about prices, but these agencies seem to only value the 5-10 whales that buy all of the content that they send them. All in all, a huge waste of potential IMO.
 
Guess YouTube earnings have decreased and she sees what others are doing. Hence onlyfans!
 
I am amazed to see how many people are crashing out in her comments. If you are mad at someone you don't know doing OF, there is no hope for you.
 
I'm subbed to the thing and I'm mad about it. She just wasted like a decade of building up a following to scam a bunch of her longtime followers with a nameless, faceless agency with some half-assed smut. It isn't THAT she's doing it that I'm mad about, it's how she is going about her business that pisses me off.
 
I don’t really understand why these girls are so bad at it. She seems really smart and does seem like she thought it through.
I’m even fine with hiring an agency to handle requests etc. Just be transparent and let people know who they’re talking to and what they’re getting for their money.
 
I like the VelvetValie way of running her page. She posts clear descriptions of what you're buying, has reasonable prices (now... when she started, everything was 50 bucks a pop. It's usually 5-15 dollars for a set now) and does not respond to DMs, ever. That's what agencies should do. Categorize and label the product. I'm really curious to know how much the top 1% of spenders actually spend. It has to be crazy if it can sustain an entire business ecosystem.
 
I think you do have more reason to complain if you paid for it. But she also lives in South Korea where porn is illegal. But I do agree that being up front with having an agency should be conveyed.
 
*Cracks knuckles and puts on glasses at his typewriter*
Let me be clear, I'm not arguing against transparency or showing what you're getting for your money. They hire agencies because it would become a full-time job if you were as big as some of these girls are. Same reason that actors and athletes have agencies. They care about profitability, not morals on a site selling sex.
However, It's not about "being bad at it". It's just simply understanding the way this industry works with parasocial relationships. No preview = mystery. Mystery = you wanting to see what's behind the curtain. If you want it bad enough, you'll buy it if you're too impulsive to wait on a leak somewhere. This strategy, however, has diminishing returns (just look at Amouranth over time).
It's all a mind game. It's all about the fantasy it sells. The same reason "idols" in Asian countries hide their relationship status. It's why you don't see women in the sex industry with wedding rings on. There is data all over the place to prove that hiding your private details sells more sex because simps think you're available and that there's "a chance to be noticed". Hiding the fact that you're not talking to them directly is the same thing. OF girls also vaguely say that "they" (the royal 'they', i.e. their agency) answer people in DMs (because tons of tipping happens there).
Becoming an OF girl already damages the image she's cultivated up to this point. She called it "empowering", but anyone with a brain knows that's bullshit. That's irreversible at this point. It's associated with her name. The issue she's likely to run into is that she's trying to stay in that middle ground where she's not selling nudes, but she's also not fully SFW. That works for some creators and sullies others. Only time will tell.
TL;DR - Most girls won't say when they're married or have a partner because it breaks the illusion for some that would otherwise pay to goon to them. It's not a grand conspiracy. It's why she said OF is for "videos too spicy for YouTube" but she'll never say that she will/won't go nude because she wants to keep that gooner audience.
 
Does anyone know what was the price for the leaked extra content?
 
She low key is a special girl that deosn't fit the agency cookie cutter methods. 🤷🏾‍♂️
 
That's just the gooner inside you huffing copium, my man. It's a cookie-cutter method because it applies to nearly everyone. She isn't special in that regard, you just don't like it.
 
Hell, if anything, the cookie cutter methods work better with ASMRtists, since they usually have either a GFE or MILF hook to them...
 
Her choice and if you don't like it then don't buy anything from her onlyfans. Why bother.
 
Well, this is a surprise, I had long given up on this one ever happening...
 
why her " viewers " are so mad that she made OF? absolute idiots, I mean shes expensive af and I dont like it but I'm not mad that she made an OF
 
You can tell they did photoshop to make her bolt-ons look a little more natural haha
 
Honestly, I dont think those fans actually saw her as a person, just something to pump out asmr content. Like wow, humans are complex and you dont know someone just from their youtube videos. That's crazy.
Also some people hear onlyfans and instantly think of hardcore porn insted of the plenty of sfw content also on the site.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top