Simp Chat sendnudesx | patriciatarka [Discussion]

I remember what I felt when I typed it, I wasn't angry, just slightly confused and baffled.

I generally don't see any animosity there.

If you took that as animosity, sorry. Whatever.

I didn't say horrible attack, I'm not tripping by anything said here . Once again, my point was that I'm confused at your agitation and irritation at what he said. People say incorrect things all the time, most people just correct them and move on, not call them names.

I honestly didn't know what "Qos" meant until today- I had to google it and research it. (So maybe I'm not all that porn-brained.)

The definition still doesn't say anything about: "ONLY loving black dick"

OP in his post said that Polish women are: "Notorious for loving black dick"

True or not, here's the distinction: He never said: "Polish women ONLY love black dick"

But what was your response? (paraphrasing):

1. "Majority European women date their own race" ( Likely true, because of shared cultural values/practices, proximity and availability. Who they date says nothing about whether these same European women like black dudes, you'd have to ask each of them individually.)

2. "Most porn women do blacked stuff "simply" because the demand is there from MEN" ( Okay? Every porn genre is a demand from men. Once again, this says nothing about whether these women like black men. Money motivations and personal attraction are different things.

Here's the golden question: what do those 2 subjects have to do with what OP said? It's very disproportionate to what he said.

When someone says "Polish women love black dick" (which doesn't mean they don't also love other kinds of dick) and you interpret that as him saying that "Polish women ONLY love black dick" and feel the need to bring up dating habits and you imply that the only reason women do this kind of content is for financial reasons is a reaction that can lead any reasonable person to the conclusion that you have some kind of complex about the topic- but I'm not inside your head, so I can't say that for sure.

How so? Questions are not typically a debate.

"lubricated" is not that big of a word dude. You've never heard anyone say the word "lubricated"? Okay

You keep playing these semantics with me dude. Who really cares? "Lubricated" takes not much more effort to type than 'wet".
 
Bruh, no one's arguing about black dick- I was wondering why some people get so triggered by the thought that women love black dudes. He is the reason this turned into some debate

My original post was barely 2 paragraphs in total. Cause he said other things about dating and content.

This is a discussion thread. Talking and discussing is the whole reason this thread was made.

It always blows my mind that the people who “only want content” don’t just stay in the content thread lol. Weird.
 
QOS literally means only black, so yes saying polish women are notoriously qos aka polish women are notorious for only fucking black dudes is infact essentially that. Even if he said 10% of Poland are notoriously qos, i'd still say it's a delusional thing to say.

"yo girl is your pussy naturally lubricated rn?" is that usually how you talk to girls :KEKW:

You're the one who quoted me, and implied insecurities/agitation/triggered of me & another user for pointing something out - whilst tryna play the "ugh i really didnt mean anything by that" - again being completely disingenuous, if you're going to personally attack someone atleast say it with your chest and not hide behind obliviousness - and yes calling someone insecure is a personal attack.

I only responded to the things you said, so no the only reason this conversation is happening is due to you my dude.

Btw for the last time, you typed 19 sentences (400+ words) not including what you quoted. That is not 2 paragraphs lmao. Even Chatgpt & Claude says it's 10 paragraphs. I think you need to revisit english class ngl.

Anyways this is a bit weird at this point, you're super invested & hung up on an off hand comment not even made to you, and are doing nothing but strawmaning/discussing in bad faith, You also don't even know what a paragraph is, so I'll check out here :OkayChampThumbs:
 
You usually beat your meat to words on a discussion thread? :KEKW:

Anyway I do agree its insanity, everytime I type a reply I hate myself a little.
 
That's not what I read. Qos -something I never head of until yesterday- says it means just a woman who enjoys sex with black men. It doesn't say nothing about ONLY black men. But some people can have a different definition, I don't care.
This is a discussion thread, not a girl. lol.
"Say it with your chest" LOL okay tough guy. Saying someone is agitated and irritated is not name calling. Saying someone has insecurities is not name calling. I even clarified that I don't know for sure what you feel, so whatever.

Bruh really counted the sentences. :KEKW: Claude and Chatgpt are stupid. Because a paragraph is 5 sentences. They're telling you a paragraph is 2 sentences or something?And what does it even matter? It took me all of 2 minutes to type. I think on a discussion thread, discussing porn, content etc is why the thread was made.

Anyways you win buddy. No more. I'm tapping out.
 
Btw I said ofc plenty of women love black dudes. I also said I watch plenty of porn with black dudes.

I said most who are doing the super fetishized stuff - qos/bnwo - are mostly doing it for money, which is kind of obvious & true for any extreme fetish content. and its relevant to bring up because he said they're notoriously qos. Is it really that difficult for you to understand?

btw -
an insult doesn't = name calling. Calling someone insecure is an ad hominem character attack.
a paragraph doesn't = 5 sentences. Thats some shit they teach you in grade school to help you learn :leokek:
calling a conversation of opposing opinions a debate doesnt = you being triggered. It's a definition/choice of words.

I think you should really learn definitons of words, because you're quite lost on most.

ty gg :OkayChampThumbs:
 
She is not running any of those IG accounts, one of the accounts just posted stolen content from other girls in a water park and she is not one of those girls. I think her real IG is @ patriciaa_111 and she looks pretty much retired (no sexy suggestive content there). Those OF probably all are just run by some company or just scammers.
 
More candids are out there

Another one from "dabootyfiles"



and one from "Sir Cappin"




And another one in London where she's wearing tight yellow leggings. I can't remember where I saw the preview and pics.

Anyone have the full videos or know where to look?
 
There are many candid sites on web, but unfortunately it takes time to find her out of thousand of candids 🤣 Reverse search works very well sometimes for identifying faces so that's an easier option. I'll look into it in my free time :)
 
Damn she need to drop a tape with that guy, he look like he beat it up unlike that bs with troy
 



I've also found these. I doubt it's a candid because of the way the video was taken (it looks like one of the posts in her IG account), but the photos say the otherwise.
 
no its not allowed on simpcity, but its not difficult to find alternative websites
 
She looks fucking insane in the pink one, it’s her best look imo. It makes me so mad that she stopped making content and does the most shitty agency thing I’ve ever seen.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top