Simp Chat Scarlett Howard - Discussion Thread

$119 + TAX for Europeans. Only two pictures of the set (according to her) include her 'nipple' being visible. Interesting how this is singular and not plural meaning I think we are going to see one and not both.

I like her but she has got to understand she isn't so special many people will pay this level of money for what is already available out there for free.
$119 should be at minimum be an adult full nude video showing pussy, boobs - everything.
 
Yeah her content has been outrageously overpriced for years now.

I have to cop tax + conversion rate to AUD, so for example $100 USD = ~$152 AUD.

Even though I could afford it, it's just too much for very little overall
 
Sad fact is, as long as people keep buying it at those prices, she'll keep doing it. The post where she explained what it included has 67 likes, got to assume that a portion of those have bought it.
Me personally, I would buy the sets if she lowered the prices to around the $30 mark and I'm sure others would too. She'd probably make more money that way with more unlocks at lower prices but guess it doesn't align with her business model.
 
Replying here as not to start a discussion in the content thread.

I'm not fed up with her content, I still enjoy it. I just feel that she's losing out on money by not going topless when simple google searches will show her tits.

And as I've mentioned my biggest gripe is her prices. I would buy more, nude or non-nude, if she lowered the prices.

I get the impression though that she's trying to market her GLO network business as non-explicit as the likes of Megan Barton Hanson, Hannah Elizabeth, Marnie Simpson and Ella Baig were all a part of that and now don't seem to be. Megan, Hannah and Marnie all seem to be under a different agency (all post and send similar messages at the same time) and Ella now does bate, dildo, anal and squirt content (if only Scarlett went down this route 🙏🏻).
 
Although Scarlett makes enough revealing content, but from my point of view she makes content that can not be considered as nudity. As for me definition of topless mean when we can see nipples exposed or to a lesser extent transparent lingerie. So she have to understand her content (that she is making now) don't cost this money.

But I still enjoy her content now. She is amazing in her weight category.
 
$99 for non-nude content.

She has sent out a message where we can buy a whopping two pictures for the low low price of just $99, where we can see one semi-visible nipple. Apparently this is a "a step towards fully topless content" and these two pictures create an 'optical illusion' where we can see her 'whole breasts'.

I mean just wow, who does she think she is and doesn't she realise we've all seen her nipples.
The delusion continues.
 
Latest dm; $129 for a photoset ‘pushing the boundaries of anything I have shot before’… TOTALLY nude- a few areola nip slips, wet glistening arse from all angles. Save your money.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top