KofiFilter
Lurker
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2024
- Posts
- 8
- Reaction score
- 0
Brother, it's 2026, and you're on SimpCity. You shouldn't have to be anybody's agent to be fully aware of the "nice guy" archetype that you painted a perfect picture of in your initial post. Please tell me that you see it. Please tell me that you're aware that "nice guys" are guys who do "favors" for women and then think they are entitled to something even though there was no agreement made in the first place. Please tell me that you understand that your post clearly shows that pattern.
I am not anyone's agent. I have been watching e-girls livestreaming for over 5 years and as a result of being in this space, I've simply become aware of what their predators look like, the same way anybody would become aware of the dynamics and patterns and characters of an environment that they spend a lot of time in. You should have this awareness too. It is necessary for survival and success.
Brother, I tell this to my AI, who I respect a lot, all the time: you have to treat me like I have an IQ over 70. Your post ends with "So yea.. that's your 'sweet' Sasha Emiri lol.". That's called a "thesis," which means "an arguable claim." The rest of the post contains multiple statements that, in concert, support the claim and only one image that accidentally contradicts the claim. That's not called "simply sharing information." That's called "making an argument."
By the way, it's totally okay to make an argument. They literally try to teach you how to do it in school. That's probably where you first heard the word "thesis." I am making arguments in my own posts as well. There is nothing wrong with trying to convince someone of a claim.
Making poor arguments, however, is not okay, and as Claude AI called out initially, there is a gaping hole in the mod's argument: people don't get banned from someone's socials, Twitch, and Discord for nothing, and there are not any statements in the mod's arguments telling me why I should accept that it happened in this case. Furthermore, the image shows that Sasha was actually appreciative of all the work that the mod did (for free), which contradicts the idea that she is someone who would ban him for nothing or that she intended to get rid of him from the beginning.
I do believe that the mod is lying when he claims to have been banned for no reason and discarded because he was no longer needed, but there is no burden of proof on me. The burden of proof is on the mod because he made the initial claim. He must provide enough evidence or testimony to make me accept that in this case, someone really did ban somone for no reason. He has not done so.
I somewhat believe that this mod did a whole bunch of work for Sasha (for free) and felt, quite wrongly, entitled to something in return. Again, the post paints a textbook picture of the very well understood "nice guy" archetype, which everyone should be aware of by now.
So what? If I tell Claude AI to tell me that 2 + 2 = 4, and it tells me that 2 + 2 = 4, does that mean that 2 + 2 doesn't actually equal 4? No. 2 + 2 equals 4 no matter what the prompt was, and it can only be proven wrong with a mathematical proof, not by saying that you didn't like the prompt.
If you want to make a real counter argument to what Claude AI said, you must convincingly argue in favor of one of these claims:
I am absolutely here to defend Sasha and to disarm "nice guys". So what? Again, this is not one of the counter arguments that you have to make if the goal is to defeat Claude AI's accurate read of the mod's post.
What's my incentive? The freer this space is of predators like "nice guys", the safer this space will be for physically attractive women like Sasha to stream and make content, so the more they will do that and the more I and everyone else here will be able to enjoy it. Nah just kidding. My incentive is that Sasha is under my desk right now sucking my dick as I write this post. That's why I'm making this post so long. She loves men who defend her instead of attack her, who would have thought? That poor mod who did all that work (for free) got a lifetime sub, meanwhile Sasha's giving me lifetime suck. *slurp slurp sluuuuuurrrrpppp*
I am not anyone's agent. I have been watching e-girls livestreaming for over 5 years and as a result of being in this space, I've simply become aware of what their predators look like, the same way anybody would become aware of the dynamics and patterns and characters of an environment that they spend a lot of time in. You should have this awareness too. It is necessary for survival and success.
Brother, I tell this to my AI, who I respect a lot, all the time: you have to treat me like I have an IQ over 70. Your post ends with "So yea.. that's your 'sweet' Sasha Emiri lol.". That's called a "thesis," which means "an arguable claim." The rest of the post contains multiple statements that, in concert, support the claim and only one image that accidentally contradicts the claim. That's not called "simply sharing information." That's called "making an argument."
By the way, it's totally okay to make an argument. They literally try to teach you how to do it in school. That's probably where you first heard the word "thesis." I am making arguments in my own posts as well. There is nothing wrong with trying to convince someone of a claim.
Making poor arguments, however, is not okay, and as Claude AI called out initially, there is a gaping hole in the mod's argument: people don't get banned from someone's socials, Twitch, and Discord for nothing, and there are not any statements in the mod's arguments telling me why I should accept that it happened in this case. Furthermore, the image shows that Sasha was actually appreciative of all the work that the mod did (for free), which contradicts the idea that she is someone who would ban him for nothing or that she intended to get rid of him from the beginning.
I do believe that the mod is lying when he claims to have been banned for no reason and discarded because he was no longer needed, but there is no burden of proof on me. The burden of proof is on the mod because he made the initial claim. He must provide enough evidence or testimony to make me accept that in this case, someone really did ban somone for no reason. He has not done so.
I somewhat believe that this mod did a whole bunch of work for Sasha (for free) and felt, quite wrongly, entitled to something in return. Again, the post paints a textbook picture of the very well understood "nice guy" archetype, which everyone should be aware of by now.
So what? If I tell Claude AI to tell me that 2 + 2 = 4, and it tells me that 2 + 2 = 4, does that mean that 2 + 2 doesn't actually equal 4? No. 2 + 2 equals 4 no matter what the prompt was, and it can only be proven wrong with a mathematical proof, not by saying that you didn't like the prompt.
If you want to make a real counter argument to what Claude AI said, you must convincingly argue in favor of one of these claims:
- The mod was actually FORCED to do all that work for Sasha (for free).
- When you give a gift to someone, you actually are entitled to something in return. So if I go to your house and put a dollar on your doorstep, you have to do whatever I want.
- Twitch mods actually do get banned for no reason all the time so there's no need to provide any support for that claim and we should all just accept it.
- The lifetime sub that Sasha gave the mod is actually proof that she didn't appreciate the mod and actually intended to get rid of him all along.
I am absolutely here to defend Sasha and to disarm "nice guys". So what? Again, this is not one of the counter arguments that you have to make if the goal is to defeat Claude AI's accurate read of the mod's post.
What's my incentive? The freer this space is of predators like "nice guys", the safer this space will be for physically attractive women like Sasha to stream and make content, so the more they will do that and the more I and everyone else here will be able to enjoy it. Nah just kidding. My incentive is that Sasha is under my desk right now sucking my dick as I write this post. That's why I'm making this post so long. She loves men who defend her instead of attack her, who would have thought? That poor mod who did all that work (for free) got a lifetime sub, meanwhile Sasha's giving me lifetime suck. *slurp slurp sluuuuuurrrrpppp*
I'm not going to put my personalized items out there, though.
I'm sure she'd make me show my face or ID or something before showing her goods if it's even real
someone bless us
