Simp Chat Rachel Cook - Discussion Thread

I don't know; I get that what she does is technically "porn", but I think if she advertised herself as a "porn model" on only fans it would be wildly misleading. This thread would be full of people calling her a scam artist.

I think she does the artistic stuff because she's an artistic person and it aligns with the kind of adult content she wants to make.
 
Its one of those things... you might remember I think earlier this year an actress named Mikey Madison won an oscar. She'd been in a movie about strippers in Vegas and the Russian Mob,I think. Haven't seen it. Anyway, when she won the award she gave a speech telling how she'd hung out with real strippers in Vegas for research, and she thanked them. The thing is, she kept referring to the strippers as "sex workers." I'd bet her stripper friends were shocked to hear themselves referred to as such, because for them, I'd bet, a "sex worker" is that girl working at the Mustang Ranch or whatever.

So, yeah, technically I guess Rachel does porn and is a sex worker, but I don't think of her as such. What's that joke about knowing what porn is when you see it? I don't see it.
 
It’s like back when there were actual magazines. Playboy wasn’t porn. Penthouse was probably porn. And Hustler was definitely porn. I’d love to see Rachel move up to at least Penthouse level material on a regular basis.
 
Lol no. Mikey Madison wouldn't call them sex workers if they hadn't described themselves as such to her. She spent time with strippers and learned from them, she didn't casually throw them under the bus because she was confused what words mean. 'Sex worker' is the correct and accepted term that people in the industry use and it covers a lot of stuff, from fucking for money to showing your tits on Onlyfans.

It's entirely possible that some people who do it do not like the term or don't refer to themselves as such, but that's up to the individual and has no bearing on the overall definition of the term.
 
I do not agree with you. I think strippers call themselves Exotic Dancers and look down upon what they consider Sex Workers, ie prostitutes.

Remember that bit in True Romance? "I'm not a whore I'm a call girl and there's a difference ya know!"
 
But it's not like we're asking her anything special (or at least I'm not), it's just a matter of daring to show a little more nudity. And by the way, I don't think she does porn at all! Maybe, as an Italian, I have a different conception of the word "porno", but that's certainly not what she does.
Regarding more explicit things that she hasn't posted (yet), I already wrote last time that it seems to me that sometimes there are cuts in the videos, I noticed, for example, in the video with that blue lingerie where she has no bottom and is framed from above, that she often looks in front of her or in other directions, as if there were more cameras... so, who knows.
But one thing's for sure, I like everything she does, and just as it is for me, it's the same for many, and she knows it...
 
I don't think you can ever expect a group of people to unanimously agree on a term like that, but I think you'd be surprised how many strippers are okay with the term stripper. The same way a lot of pornstars aren't going to demand that you call them "adult entertainers," and most janitors don't need you to refer to them as custodial technicians.
 
"homemade… uncensored full frontal nude… no filter, no bs… just me in my hotel room having a lil too much fun ;) can u tell?! 🐱😜… fuck it lets do it, 5mins long" $100 video. havent seen one that high in a while
 
does she ever mark those full frontals down mentioned above? tempting, but I'm afraid of the full frontal being only a pic
 
I don't know, I guess it's been a long time since I've talked to a stripper, maybe "sex worker" is something only internet girls are cool with but it's pretty widely accepted as an umbrella term by most girls who make sexual content.

But, I'm not sure it's a term used very often in the "real world". It's mostly used to fight against the conservative types that make it harder for them to make a living.

I think she's already unsent and resent that one. It's $95.95 now and probly cheaper for cookie monsters. There will probly be cheaper prices in the next day or two. But, yeah, probly just a pic or two of full frontal.
 
I think Mikey Madison would have a better idea of what the people she talked to and learned from are fine with being called. Also, you're quoting to me a movie that's over 30 years old which is maybe where your understanding of this is still rooted.
 
from what i've noticed, usually the catalyst for heavy discounts is the fact the content was already leaked
 
I fully agree.

More often than I am willing to accept, I have bought discounted content thinking I made a good deal to find out it was leaked content. For example, yesterday.
 
I enjoy reading all of these discussions and comments. But the simple truth is that Rachel can put out literally anything she wants to and we will all want to see it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top