Simp Chat Rachel Cook - Discussion Thread

I don't think likes in a discussion thread count toward simpcity's requirements, only those in content threads. You can try posting some pics/vids here and the mods will probably move it to the content thread, and that'll be your 'in'.
 

Does anyone know if this video was posted in the content thread and where, because I searched for it, but I can't find it... Thanks
 
Went through my own stash (which includes everything from the content thread) and can't find that one
 
idk why but it’s hotter when she’s recording it herself like in this and some other similar vids she’s done
 
Was going to say something similar. I think this is the longest she’s given us a full view - what was it like six full seconds?
 
"Cant compete wih AI so i might just have to fuck my pussy on OF" - Rachel Cook

My dream :cumsby:
 
Onlyfans really need to crack down on AI-content creators and have them very clearly flagged as such or better yet get them off the platform completely.

I can't imagine anyone in their right mind paying for AI-created nudes, unless they are falling for these creators being real people which happens scaringly often, thus the clear explicit flag needed for AI-content creators.

That way Onlyfans can remain a bastion for any real Thot to create their content in peace and leave intstagram, passes and fan-fix to be overflowed with AI-Thots and AI-creators.
 
OF hardly has any non real creators. They mostly use fanvue and other platforms. But the biggest issue for real women is that IG is the main way "normies" find them and IG is fulllll with AI thots, and many are hard to distinguish from real.
 
She has a point, but her and others like her also competing with themselves when they keep posting the same content over and over and over and over and over. Why pay to see the latest when it shows less than the stuff from earlier in the career.
 
Yeah, OF has been pretty good at this. Meanwhile, IG is flooded with AI content and fake women with completely unrealistic body proportions and strangely similar attractive faces. It doesn't seem like IG has any interest in controlling that content or properly flagging it.
 
Yeah, that clip's from, like, May or so, but she's been talking about upping her social media game to compete with AI for at least a couple years now. I think the biggest change she's made is that she's mostly stopped posting new content on Snap...
 
The irony is that trying to make more real and authentic content, you're also just producing more stuff for AI to 'learn' from.

Arguably OF's biggest problem is the widespread use of agencies, which already makes it feel like you're talking to AI even when following real creators.
 
A lot of agencies use AI chatbots, but that's another story.

It's getting harder to spot them since they can have different personalities and, if fed with enough data, they can act quite independently.

Honestly, I hope that there will be legislation that OnlyFans models will be forced to actually write with you. It's not too much to ask for five minutes of attention if they want a hundred bucks, in my opinion.
 
We're the ones downloading and distributing OF content en masse in violation of copyright laws in just about every country on earth... The laws have existed in some form for generations and yet we do this with basically no repercussions, as long as we're somewhat careful. The legislation already exists, but is meaningless without enforcement.

Even if some country made laws to govern how OF creators must interact with subscribers.. good luck enforcing any of that.

For someone as popular and successful as Rachel, 5 minutes per subscriber isn't actually feasible.. there aren't enough hours in the day. I want her attention just as much as anyone else, but it actually makes sense that she can't pay attention to me that way, even if she wants to.
 
I dare say you're a bit naive if you don't think creators like Rachel get tons of messages every single day. Of course you could just keep making the privilege more and more expensive till the amount of people willing to pay for it is so small that you can do it yourself but I don't see any creator doing this for long if they're also trying to have a social life.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top