Simp Chat Rachel Brockman

Very surprised this hasn't been made yet, and didn't want to cram up the main thread. The guy on reddit types like a scammer when I reverse searched the images, I'm curious if you guys can share your experience. I've spent money on Rachel before on her fanfix and she is probably the most obvious scammer I've met, she doesn't have the personality and it shows clearly. Unless her price is very insane
 
yeah the pics and the res just feel off though, it also just doesn't feel like her personality. The BG did feel a bit more blurred than usual though.
 
The guy was legit, he showed me a vid of her moving around on the boat. Basically a vid from that ass pic in her blue and black bikini on the boat. Was charging an insane amount for any sneak peek though.
 
damn so all girls really got a price, she does such a good job hiding her intentions too
 
Yeah the dude said she's Katelyn OF level slutty, except she just charges an insane amount to be. And yeah she hides it well, couldn't ever suspect her being like that
 
Don't quote me on this, I'm just passing on info I've heard. Apparently she's sold more blurred nudes for $100+ and there was a vid of her BARELY flashing her pussy for $500 :PepeWhy:
 
blurred nudes for $100 is insane wtf, like I know it's a lot but like I know janicee.janicee does $100 for a bikini set like
 
Little bits of that video have appeared here and there for a while (and shown up in the content thread) and don't seem particularly special either. These guys who get some pics and then gatekeep them for money are subhuman scammers, you can't trust a single word they say.
 
Yeah no way she's selling even blurred nudes for $100 when her highest passes tier is $92/month, and why she'd be sneaky about it when she could just do OF like Breckie did makes no sense. I'd be expecting >$2k to see anything nude of her if you didn't know her IRL.
 
Indeed, 100 bucks for blurred nudes sounds like pure bullshit, i wouldnt trust anything a guy says after saying that
 
Okay, while I doubt Rachel does this.. it's not as deep as you make it out to be.
1. She may do $100 a blurred nude. There are people who would pay that much for that content, but will never do a monthly sub of $100. Is she just going to give that money up? Also, the costs are inflated. Every influencer I've ever talked to can have their prices talked down by at least 50%.
2. OF is seen as a brand risk. Some girls do nude shit via Dropbox so they don't get the social stigma of having a OF. This point may be moot due to Katelyn having an OF, but yeah.
Again, I doubt she does that content but there is validity.
 
I still kinda disagree so just sharing my thought process
  • There are definitely dropbox sellers (pretty common on twit/reddit) but I doubt they're likely to be famous celebs/tiktokers/etc (which kinda ties into the brand risk). I'll get back to this in a little
  • The brand risk is tied not only to OF but also to just the nudes selling; I doubt brands care if it's onlyfans, pornhub, mainstream, or just twitter nudes; if someone's selling nude pics then brands are going to be a little more cautious about working with them (usually)
  • Brand risk but low cost nudes are fundamentally incompatible. If the content is raunchy enough to be a brand risk, then it's too pricey to only be $100. Not that $100 is necessarily cheap to the buyer, but it's pennies in terms of the seller's reputation. If the seller has a lot to lose, they're gonna charge top dollar so that they don't have to sell many of them. Again, $100 isn't gonna magically change Rachel's mind the way it might someone with a lot less popularity
  • If maximizing money on nudes is the goal, then it doesn't make sense to be quiet about it; instead, it's much more profitable to convert an existing audience fully to NSFW content then to only sell to people who jump through countless hoops to be able to buy
  • Actually being able to talk to the creator is tough - passes and similar sites are swarmed with agencies, and good luck getting through DMs on any standard social media
  • Greatest likelihood for nude content is via leaks of people the creator would just send to rather than sell to
Main point being: there are a few profiles of nude sellers:
  • Low-to-no popularity: can range all the way from secret dropbox types to fully out OF stars because there is no brand risk
  • Mid popularity: this is where you're most likely to see the secret dropbox sellers who may indeed be swayed by $100 or so into selling nudes without wanting to risk their (potentially) growing branding
  • Top popularity: Either fully committed to selling content or trying to get as close to selling content as possible without having to show anything "risky; in other words, OF stars vs Passes creators. It doesn't make sense at this level to be a passes-type creator ("family friendly") and risk it all selling nudes on the side for minimal gain ($100 isn't doing much at this tier), especially when plenty of money can be made without brand risk (Passes/Fanfix). If they're gonna take on the brand risk of selling NSFW (even if they don't actually show anything), they're generally gonna jump in and try to maximize the amount of money they do make.
Now not saying people don't do things that don't make sense... but I think it's unlikely with Rachel unless she were to fully commit to it like Breckie.
 
She's at the point where it would actually hurt her to start an OF, she didn't get into the modeling game with like her body in itself. It was her personality and facecard on TikTok then the collabs and dances. WAYYY different from Breckie Hill or most girls that take the route at the end. I do think she's made slow pivots into it but full committing like Breckie will never happen, when she stops making as much money she'll prolly go to the katelyn route.
 
So did anyone ever buy from the Reddit guy? Legit at all? Seems too good to be true haha
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top