Simp Chat Piper Pockelle - [Discussion Thread]

they make too much to care. refund the money to those who bitch and move on with their day. they'll still make millions more.
 
It's hilarious that the guy who made OF didn't envision it being a smut peddling site. He wanted it to be more SFW. But then the money poured in, he made hundreds of millions, sold it for hundreds of millions more and bounced.
 
OF is complicit. They're pushing two totally different narratives to content creators and their audiences.
They tell the audiences that they have a platform where they can interact with their favorite content creators.
They tell the content creators that they have a platform to peddle their content.
In many/most cases the content creators actually have zero interaction with their audience, outside of the occasional livestream. Other than that, it's mostly just agencies providing all of the "interaction" and that's only as a means to their own ends (selling content)
Forgive the dated reference, but at least when you go to the movie theater to see the latest MCU movie, you know you're just going to see a movie. If they worked on the OF business model, they'd be selling tickets with the promise of getting to interact with ScarJo and RDJ.
 
the thing is, if you want her to start pushing the limits or doing more, basically take away her source of money. i know it will never happen because there's enough guys that are paying to see bra and thong shots. but, i would almost guarantee, if enough people stopped paying and basically said this content isn't worth it, she would escalate. Again, i know that's not gonna happen. but as long as you keep paying for basic stuff, nothing will change.
 
Completely agree on this, People should stop buying so that creators realize the need to drop the half acts
 
they do, it just takes years lol. It’s literally the creator does start going further and further. OR they make there money and they physically r satisfied with there bag and just post the same shi they post on IG
 
it's a very simple and very smart solution in theory, but too many pay pigs would send money for the shittiest content anyway, so it's quite impossible in practice. Even if all of the people on this forum that are subbed to her were to stop, there's just so much income from others that it's just not feasible unfortunately. I wish though lol.
 
why do people bother with creators that make shit content or that basically lie such as Camilla and asiha ir baffles me?
 
The amount of money that I have given to Piper is exactly $0.00. But it is pretty clear you are rage baiting so :MLADY:
 
If everyone followed your example, she would be fucked by dredd today, sadly her fans have somehow made her this "whore who doesnt suck dick" character, it's insane to me, but maybe someone can explain it when they look back at the history of whores.
 
Bro trust me she really likes me, she said on onlyfans i have a yummy cock! I think im gonna marry her!
 
Why are mods taking down video screen shots of the most of her boobs she has ever shown? Like I thought that is what we are all waiting for. It would be better if they posted the videos they are screenshotted from but it is better than nothing and the mods remove. The latest post was her with the most exposed boobs in the entire thread and it was deleted by mods.
 
it's against the rules to post screenshots to videos. they can go here in the discussion thread. but not the content thread as they are just screenshots to a video
 
I think you should bypass the rules for that one. When she posts a 7 minute video and there's 4 seconds of it that people actually want to see, maybe let the screen shots go. The screen shots are gonna save people scrubbing through a shit video with shit music having to pause and rewind to see a single frame of a nipple. The screen shotters are the heros.
 
This is the most annoying take in all of goonering.
I’ve never paid a single cent to any online woman. Never even given them a like, comment on posts, tried to DM them, nothing. Don’t watch streams or anything of the sort. Come here for the highlights and that’s it.
Yet, if one pushes back on anything that some random jamoke pulls out of their ass about any woman, the “white knight” and “she’s not going to fuck you, lil bro” bullshit comes out, even when it makes no sense. So tiring.
There is a huge space in between “{woman} is a flawless goddess who should be put on a pedestal and worshipped with money and gifts, how dare you impugn her looks/personality/content/whatever!” and that “All women/{specific woman} are average-looking dumb bitch scamming whores” incel fuckery. Being anywhere above the latter isn’t auto-white knighting/simping.
Dude was making an obviously broad point about preferences that applies not only beyond this Piper chick, but beyond women in general that could be applied to anything that anyone pays any money for.
What is essentially a “different strokes for different folks—getting angry about it (especially to a piracy board where the vast majority aren’t paying) is a waste of energy” point doesn’t even make sense/fit as a so-called “white knight” argument, because it isn’t specific to “defending” any woman. What are they “white knighting” for, freedom of choice!? It’s not like anyone is saying “Piper’s (or another woman’s) non-nude content is beyond reproach and worth any price”.
I don’t support it, but it’s no surprise to me that sex workers often develop hateful attitudes toward men with the tons of nonsensical if not outright dumb shit they must read in their inboxes from us as a group, holy shit.
 
Kinda goes against the concept of rules, don’t you think?
They can be heroes in the discussion thread. You’re talking like screenshots are banned when they’re not.
 
i find it incredibly weird how much she leans into and talks about when she was underage on social media. like she literally puts photos of her as a teen next to photos of her now and asks people which they prefer.
Her accounts gotta be run by the feds.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top