Simp Chat kimchiee - Discussion Thread

No but she created a new twitter acc. Also her suspension might be just for a few days due to mass reports?
 
Had to delete the nude video I posted of her cause she started to threaten to sue me 🤦‍♂️
 
Don’t know if any of the threats mean anything cause I use a 3rd party card service that doesn’t connect to my bank but I don’t feel like dealing with some E-girl trying to find out who I really am
 
She's buying bot (farmed) accounts and she's surprised that she's getting suspended? :WeirdChamp:
 
Nah bro that stuff means nothing its just a way of scaring you lmao, post that ish for the boys or flip the video in edit, and that way its backwards and not automatically readable
 
I mean that's just copyright registration which I think is kinda pointless as it should all fall under DMCA anyways, so that's a protection every content out there has even just IG or YT content.
The point is that unless there is watermarking with a UID on the video (which last I checked is not supported by OF), there's no way for them to know who actually leaked it. Even if they end up on this thread and see "Oh my God my video was leaked!" They have no way to distinguish you from anyone else who bought the video, and thus can't actually do anything.
 
That is true for the most part. I just checked her site and her Bio says she is using Rulta, checking their "Service" mentions exactly what you were refering to with the watermarking UID.
https://blog.rulta.com/who-leaked-my-content-rulta-watermark-has-the-answer
That's probably the invisible watermark he was talking about. Also he said she directly messaged him. And as far as I remember every single person that had her explicit stuff up here, deleted it shortly after.
But who really knows. Maybe it's all a bluff.
 
The fact that they talk about prevention being better than detection makes me think it's BS. Whatever magical embed they have with your UID in it still won't be picked up by a screen recording unless they are literally just putting a watermark in one frame of the vid and nobody is seeing it. But everything on their site is saying it's not a watermark, so IDK, I'd have to dig more into what specifically that embed is.
 
They're probably just monitoring the hash. I don't imagine that many people are buying her PPV, so it'd be easy for her to threaten all the customers with bogus lawsuits after Rulta informed her that her videos had been posted elsewhere. I doubt that they even got an IP associated with the leak as they'd need a warrant for something like that. Use a VPN if you're paranoid that could happen then (it won't). If the vid was a customer for this specific poster, it'd make a lot more sense why she was able to target him specifically.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top