Simp Chat Isabelle Miller - Discussion Thread

As I said before, the problem isn't her face, her body, or even her enthusiasm in the scenes; it's her actual content on OF—which is neither substantial nor up-to-date. Not long ago, I saw a pack via DM labeled "DOGGYSTYLE SEX" that included six videos. I bought it all excited, but the videos were garbage—she just showed her tits and not much else, and each clip lasted only 20 to 30 seconds. In short, it had nothing to do with the title.
 
Exactly and I honestly feel that she's obviously only doing the sex for the money because looking at her other content, she seems to be far more enthusiastic about travel and living an influencer's life. It almost gives that she'd rather not be in the sex industry at all and given that she hasn't gotten mainstream notice, she's probably not really about it that much.
On a side note, I feel the lack of mainstream notice is partially because her accent is so strong at times that you cannot understand her without subtitles.
 
An that is a very fair take. I agree skin tone playing a factor. But on another note I do believe butter face as a title is thrown around too looseley now a days
 
It is not only thrown around too often, it is also incorrectly used like "snowbunny". I don't think everyone knows it is "everything butterface (but her face)". I see it used on ugly chicks with one other feature like great boobs and terrible ass. It should be a truly ugly chick that is great everywhere else but the face. And not just because she isn't your type but bad teeth or crooked nose. I understand subjectivity but these labels have gotten out of hand and usually are used too liberally, which throws off searches.
 
girlfriend experience not influencer lol. That's what she was doing before she pivoted into porn. same as connie perignon.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top