Simp Chat FrivolousFox ASMR - Discussion Thread

joining her patreon has to be some type of humiliation ritual.. also who is telling her to use the Tascam :LULW:
 
1. Yes the Tascam is trash, I am glad I have found my people here, since on yt no one seems to mind

2. I don't understand what you guys are talking about with her being between sfw and nsfw. I feel like she never gave us anything that could be deemed sexual. Yes she has licked some phallus shaped objects in her time (who hasn't?), but it never seemed overly sexual in any way. I know that for some the ear eating and mouth sounds are pretty sexual, but I don't think she feels this way.
I'd kill for a remotely sexual video from her like Lin ASMR does, that would be something totally new from her
 
Here's the litmus test I'd give. Would she suck on that candy cane like she did in front of her father? Would she lick one of her male friend's ears like she does in her videos? My guess is she'd say no. What she does isn't overtly sexual and tbh I like it better like that. Too often when chicks venture into NSFW ASMR it turns into porn rather than sexy ASMR. The sounds are usually terrible. "ASMR pussy sounds" don't make me feel relaxed. I want sensual soothing asmr with a bit of arousal. For example if she did the same things she normally did but naked instead that would be a plus.
 
I think it is a wierd comparison. Obviously you wouldn't do these roleplays outside of asmr either.
I enjoy her asmr for asmr sake, the mouth sounds when eating or licking food, the ear eating of the mic or even the kisses videos.
Especially the latter is just very comforting to me.

I think it is not the ear licking you do, it is how you do it.
If you put a great emphesis on the licking, do closeups of the tongue in an erotic way, or deepthroat a banana of course it is sexual, but I don't think her content and the content of a lot of ear eaters in the asmr scene is in any shape or form sexual.
That said of course you can get sexual gratification out of ear licking
 
When you notice that the same actions she has performed in one video become a source of discomfort for her in a later one—yet she proceeds to do them again—it suggests an underlying sense of unease (likely sexual in nature), followed by a return to the behavior because she convinces herself it isn't sexual. There is a profound mental conflict at play. This confusion stems from the fact that, at times, the act feels sexual to her, while at other times it does not; it reflects an internal struggle regarding her own desire—whether or not to perform the action, whether or not to reveal what she is doing. To clarify, we aren't talking about explicitly sexual content, but rather "simple" details that nonetheless make a world of difference in a video.

For instance, a recent Tascam-based video shows less than one from August; the intent and the "triggers" remain the same, yet the execution differs—one is well-crafted, the other poorly so, with one revealing more than the other.

A second example—one I like to bring up because the situation is strikingly clear—dates back to when she was still doing "ear-eating" videos on YouTube. There was a distinct turning point when she began positioning the 3DIO microphone in a way that allowed her to lick and "eat" the ears; that was when she truly started to care about whether or not she should show what she was doing. I recall one of those hour-long ear-licking videos where she made a deliberate point of keeping her actions hidden for the entire duration.
After a long period of "censored" ear-licking, she gradually and subtly began to show more, eventually reaching a point where she featured the ear-licking in a completely explicit manner. Since then, her approach has remained volatile. It’s not as if she alternates between explicit content and a hyper-vigilant, second-by-second effort to hide everything from one video to the next; rather, it follows a strange, long-term cycle.

Bizarrely, she’ll turn the 3DIO microphone around, dim the lights, use her hands on the screen, or cover the ears with them. Then, out of the blue, she might make an entire video dedicated to licking the lenses. It seems to go in cycles; it’s never clear whether she actually cares about the sexualization aspect or not. It’s all very strange to me. It’s worth noting that, alongside the introduction of stricter censorship, she significantly scaled back her "ear-licking" content—and this happened *before* YouTube’s new policy, which rules out the idea that it was a response to pressure from the platform.

Nowadays, with Patreon in the mix, things are a bit different—though there have been some criticisms. For instance, in a 30-minute video from November of last year, only about a third (10 minutes) actually featured ear-licking; the rest was just blowing into the ears—it felt like she was just padding out the runtime. I’m not sure if that’s because people had paid for it, or if she’s simply stopped worrying as much about whether the content is sexual or not. But as I mentioned in earlier comments, this recent "Tascam" trend has raised a red flag for me. This is the second such video in just one month, and the situation has clearly intensified. It’s possible that, moving forward, she might start populating her Patreon with the same kind of content she could easily post on YouTube.
 
Speaking directly to the point about padding I've noticed in the last couple years that, at least the channels I follow, all of them refuse to do one single type of trigger for the entire video anymore. Often they load up 5 or more triggers in a single video and none of them get enough focus. This is the issue with the commercialization of ASMR. In an effort to maximize their views and revenue they try to pander to everyone in every single video. Some triggers are very divisive and they know that if they do an entire video focused on one trigger it won't get as many views as a combo video. I've been listening to less and less to the channels I've been subbed to and now just search for the specific trigger I wanna hear and load up a random video from the search results.
 
Good point, my friend. And that’s assuming it’s not a case of clickbait—for instance, the video I mentioned, the "exclusive" one from last November: if that had been a YouTube video, it would have been a classic piece of clickbait, given that two-thirds of it had nothing to do with the main hook—which is pretty underhanded.
Friv doesn’t usually do things like that, but he has pulled this kind of stunt on YouTube several times.
 
During this new screen kissing video I noticed the ring on her middle finger. Is the wedding band on the middle finger some kind of “fuck you” to her chastity? And doesn’t this mean she will make more explicit content like during her first break up? Or am I ready way to much into it? It’s like the first time she ever wore a ring as far as I remember!
 
"Wearing a ring on the middle finger often symbolizes balance, responsibility, and personal growth, and it can also reflect confidence and individuality. Some people use it to signify commitment or a non-traditional promise without romantic meaning."

Probs just wearing a ring because she wants to look like a pretty girl wearing a ring.
Or she's going to do a full nude asmr video with just cat ears. 50/50 in my book. haha
 
It has a gemstone (fake?) in it. Maybe that means something… anyway if she was into this kind of vague symbolism (she looks like a woman who is) the stability and non-traditional part might be promising for us gooners ;) I’m still hoping tho!
 
The kissing video is good, but there’s a lot of filler—minutes spent on cleaning that aren't really necessary. I think I’ll edit it down; this 23-minute video will probably end up being, what, maybe 5 minutes long? Yeah, it really drags on, lol.
 
First of all, why do you use these em dash like an ai.

Secondly I feel like we interpret a lot more into her videos than she might have thought of when shooting them.
It's easy to read stuff into every single thing she does or doesn't do.
Maybe she started covering the ear because people sexualized it and it made her feel uneasy, or maybe she just wanted to keep monitization or her sponsoring deals. You simply don't know the real reason. For me it lies closer to think that she would cover the ear for better sound and because people sexualize it, not because she herself thinks its sexual.

I just don't think you can consider her content nsfw in any shape or form
 
Oh, sorry about the dashes. I was just using them.

I only arrive at these complex conclusions because I follow a line of reasoning that goes beyond what you mentioned.
If she were doing this because of the sexualization, she would never do it explicitly again.

As I mentioned, these are cycles. It’s all just speculation. I don’t know the real reason, and if anyone claims to know, there’s a good chance they’re wrong, too. Given how volatile her decisions are, it’s difficult to pinpoint the actual motive.

Still, we’re here to talk about her. Without her input, all we can do is speculate, and my line of reasoning seems plausible to me. If you actually have something to contribute that might change this line of reasoning, I’m open to it. But as it stands, your hypothesis stops short of the ones I’ve been developing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top