Simp Chat Cockteasefiona [Discussion Thread]

True, but she’s still got them lil swangaz :wowers:

I think the new look (skinny) actually works even better for her “MILF” persona. That said, I wouldn’t want her getting any thinner than she is now.
 
I have already explained the context in my initial posts here, I was the first person to bring attention to this podcast to a wider audience, so for those interested they can read my other posts on my profile.

On the facts of the matter you are simply misinformed, lying and lacking information. As I believe I mentioned in my previous posts, Sloansmoans and Jolielyon also did the podcast and they do not "pretty much say the same things in their interviews", that is just a lie as both clearly establish that their primary motivation for engaging with the more extreme forms of taboo content is business related. According to you MissBeatrix "seemingly encouraged creators to say wild shit" by having Sloansmoans and Jolielyon voluntarily disclose that their venture into more extreme forms of taboo content was monetary as opposed to personal interest. Let's go with the model that actually works to with this discrepancy, MissBeatrix was doing a podcast about sex where she interviewed people with different personal views.

Also, although it's somewhat of a different discussion, MissBeatrix was never involved in the actual business of PP and while she did have initially a close relationship with Katie on a personal level, technically her position at PP was the same as Fiona in the sense that she was a creator affliated with the site so it is wrong to say "her platform". MissBeatrix was actually one of the first creators to disassociate from PP.
 
Katie is Katie Starling, a content creator who makes a lot of incest and 4g3play content that is prohibited here. She also runs a separate website, which I won't link here, but is called p3rv3rt p4r4dise (replace the numbers with the actual letters).

I made the mistake of joining that site once, it was basically a slow, shitty web-based clone of Discord at the time. Without getting too specific, it was too extreme for my tastes. Lots of people there talking about their p3do tendencies and why looking at CSAM has been a lifelong struggle for them, etc.

I panicked that I was even associated with a site like that and deleted the account and left. While I didn't see any actually CSAM on the site, and I've been told they go to great lengths to prevent it, they get as close as you possibly can to CSAM without having any. Anime, renders, stories, audios, caption photos with text that would make a jury trial throw away the key even if you hadn't broken any actual laws just because somebody who reads stuff like that probably shouldn't be around other people, in their mind. Even though it's been a while I still worry that when that site gets shut down (and I have no doubt that it will - if they shut down m0therless they'll shut down this one) somebody will run a list of emails that were registered and I'll get a visit from the cops even though I broke zero laws and saw no actual illegal content, the chat channels there were definitely full of people who had served time for CSAM and were talking about "recently relapsing this afternoon" and stuff. Just like...guys...wtf is this?
 
Holy fuck, that sounds like an insane illegal honeypot. Definitely good idea to not be associated with that, super super sketchy! Shocked it hasn't been shut down. Thanks for the information, much appreciated.
 
Katie and her deranged husband think they are running some kind of mental health facility, it's actually pretty hilarious. She really buys into the whole trauma healing angle, as a way to legitimize her deranged lifestyle and choice of partner. Anyway, I wouldn't worry about what your saying specifically just by the fact there isn't really anything dangerous on there, just a bunch of boomers being boomers (well it's dead now anyway).
 
I looked into this because I'd never heard of "Harm Prevention" as a psychiatric concept. On its surface, I kind of understand why the argument is made. The logic being "these are people that would harm others if we don't give them an outlet, so this will be a kind of 'pressure release valve' for these urges that is legal." So I researched it a bit.

It is complete BS. Every single study even tangentially related to this has led to the exact opposite conclusion - that people with these urges consistently escalate their behavior, and the only way to prevent them from escalating is by de-escalating. Preventing them from being in situations where they are exposed to triggering items/situations.

Otherwise what ends up happening is the gateway syndrome. Guy starts with jerking off to music videos on youtube -> then moves to dance competitions -> then seeks out modeling websites -> next thing you know he's on the dark web looking for shit that put eight people behind bars in 2009 or something.

And I don't for a second believe that Katie and her husband actually believe that they are doing any harm prevention. This is just a thinly veiled way for them to make money off pedos and content creators.

I'm actually all for fantasy content for people - if somebody wants to watch furry porn or 4geplay porn or whatever in order to mix it up once in a while? As long as everyone's a consenting adult, go nuts. The issue for me is when it becomes a necessity for those people. Like they can't get off unless somebody's getting hurt or pretending to get hurt.

I would not be shocked at all if somebody on PP got busted soon and it turned out this was just a front for a huge CSAM ring or something.
 
I just wish we had a crack team like you guys looking in to the rape gangs. Look, I know it's not your jurisdiction, and you're really busy looking in to a junkie who accommodates people adding text to images of Piper Perri. But, maybe you could train some officers to look in to actual CA.
 
Harm reduction is very much a real thing, just not in this context. Harm reduction can be something like having narcan around in case someone ODs, or having a safe place to dispose of needles. Even something as simple as keeping your alcoholic buddy away from alcohol is considered harm reduction, because you are minimizing any potential risks.

What these people are doing is continually exposing themselves to the thing that harms them. No one could logically argue, from an addictions standpoint, "I need to keep drinking a little alcohol so that I can manage my addiction to alcohol." Yet this is essentially the argument these people are making.

There is plenty of professional help available for these people, if they really wanted to get it.
 
Oh yeah I meant in the context of p3dophilia not in the context of, like, narcotics or something. I know that, for example, alcoholics who have been daily drinking for excessively long periods that try and quit cold turkey can actually go into seizures and such so they give them medication to help prevent that. Had a friend die when he tried to quit cold turkey. Had a seizure and died at the office of all places.

Harm prevention is real for other things, but not in the way they're preaching it.
 
I though I got lost and entered a different discussion thread, wtf is going on. Anyway anyone have the "Taboo Obsession" please share. thanks
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top