Simp Chat Ashley Tervort Discussion Thread

I’ll believe it when I see it…..until then, most of us have been burned a time or two by girls who promise and don’t deliver ..she has a track record of tease and was pretty successful doing it before… why would she differ from that now?….time will tell, but I am not going to hold my breath…forewarned is for forearmed.
 
This makes sense.
There was no pattern to predict more than what she has given. And she is really smart with prices.
The DM replies I got were delayed and brief. That's typical of authentic girls. She might have an assistant, though.
Ashley is exactly like Sophie Mudd. Only I get the feeling she wants to show nipples and maybe pussy this time around, but mostly for ego.
Pretty girls don't have to put out and statistically are less likely to be whores. They might get nude because of ego and the attention their figure command, but they are rare in porn. That's why porns pale compared with Playmates and Top Models. Ashley is like a modern Playboy Playmate of the year.
 
Maybe back in the beginning days of OF but i was downloading everything as a habit. SO i wouldn't have noticed if something was removed.
I have (and will always) zero trust in digital only platforms when you don't have supreme control of the content you "purchase".
 
That makes sense. But how did that disappear?
One is that I accidentally pressed the hide button on six out of the 8 videos.
Other that she erased it.
And another is an OF malfunction.
 
No when asked about it they said they would contact support. My guess is they delete the messages. I had some lives/content sent from tips and they ended up being deleted via the agency or whatever. I am suspect of purchasing anything like that for the future now
 
The fact that she didn't show anything during the live stream isn't the real issue.
But everything else clearly points to agency management:
The fact that she's already talking about collaborating with other models.
The fact that the video quality of her live stream was poor, as well as the video being sold for $40, only to later be presented as an improvement, or all the media she post on insta and other always good quality.
The way she's playing the potential girlfriend role.
She didn't start on OnlyFans; she's making a comeback by announcing sexier content, but when asked about it, no answer.
 
If an account is managed by agency does that mean the content will be worse compared to when run by the girl herself? If not then why are you guys stuck at this agency thing? I only care about seeing her fully nude. I dont care if it is run by agency, herself or some alien.
 
Agencies are extremely predictable, girls aren't. You don't know what to expect when a girl manages her own OnlyFans, she might answer all the DMS, she might end up making a ton of personalized content, etc. With agencies it would always be more or less the same, they're hired to maximize earnings, and they already know all the tricks on the book. Ashley's good reputation came from the era she did most of the heavy work by herself.
 
I personally have no interest in becoming friends with a woman I'll never meet in person. I think that's the mistake most people make here. We shouldn't be trying to form intimate relationships with these women.
 
I agree. I don't see the point of a paid friendship, and I also believe it would never end up well. But it's also hard to deny that some people want to interact with the girls, and agencies would never say the truth to costumers. They'll never say that you're just talking with Suresh and if you're generous enough you might end up talking with Ashley.
It should be a simple transaction: give me pics and videos and I'll give you money, but it's usually more complicated than that.
 
I am sure in almost all cases it is the girl who decides what type of content she wants to do. sure an agency can give her suggestions and if they only care about maximizing the earning I feel they personally would want the girl to post more explicit content bc ofcourse that would make more money. But so many guys seem to be way more interested in 1 on 1 chat with her even when deep down we all know that if you have to pay someone to talk to you then that so called friendship means absolutely nothing.
 
If she's referring to Sophie Mudd as the GOAT then there is no way we're getting full nudes
 
Christ. Saying Sophie Mudd is the GOAT is outrageous. She is hot but she doesn't even do nudes and there have been way hotter women that have gone nude multiple times. Heck, even when it comes to big tits Tessa Fowler has her beaten and unlike Sophie she actually showed them too.
All Sophie is the GOAT at is scamming people.
 
Hell I’d put cece rose over Sophie. At least Cece puts more into scamming and acts a little lol. But I think she mentioned Sophie bc chat kept bringing her up and guys she should collab with(which I will never get)
 
Yea, who cares if an agency runs the account or not. I don't want to talk to her. I want her to give us the tits, but she doesn't.
 
I can’t even imagine how many messages she gets lol. I messaged her 8 hours ago before work “nice tits” and she hasn’t even read it yet
 
The issue with agencies is that they know dudes are crazy to get anything revealing so they'll make you waste your time and money to keep you thirsty when there was never anything to see in the first place.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top