Simp Chat Ashlee Davis - Discussion Thread

its bc there's no watermark so they 'cant tell' it wasnt from before, even though you can very clearly fucking tell.
 
They can tell, they are just being obtuse in the name of being moral I guess. If it’s from before, take it down. It’s not hard to tell the difference.
 
Brother it’s just the rules because otherwise you have to verify every single fucking video/pic on “oh what exact date was this one taken”
Nah it’s not worth the time or effort instead of just banning anything that’s not watermarked.

Also more importantly mfs are lucky that watermarked content is even allowed because she got banned from multiple platforms when she started selling because she was using UA content still and directly selling that shit as “old content”.
Bitch is weird af.
 
So ur telling me she just found a way to stop her content getting leaked by making yall her free dmca copyright strike agents. Gg
 
I'd rather them remove non-watermarked stuff than end up having the entire website taken down because of this greasy scamming whale.
 
The opposite, she actually hates that her shit cant get posted because of it LMAO. Talked to her before, she burned through all the money she made off the initial hype and now barely anyone subs because of her agency(thats why she has the fanvue because her agency is ass but she has a contract). But shes complained a fuckton that not only can she not post on any sites because they just ban her but she was bitching that leak sites wont even post her content because it requires a watermark.
 
does she actually sell her older content bruh??? Jesus I thought she was in enough trouble as is
 
I have all
i purchased it it has bbc blowjobs and sextapes in it plus like a semi pro scene I just need someone to fix my 02 sensor on my car and I can post it
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top