amberfix23
Lurker
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2024
- Posts
- 11
- Reaction score
- 0
Find a single sentence where I claimed she's still running the page herself. I'm genuinely curious, because that's simply not true. You're arguing against something I never said.
We're talking about two completely different things. It feels like you're replying to an argument you invented instead of the one I actually made.
The problem is that you're presenting speculation as if it were an established fact.
Do you have any proof that she won't return to running the account herself? Because I haven't seen any.
She may have simply taken a temporary break, delegated the account while recovering after giving birth, and decided to come back later. That's just as plausible as your theory that she's gone for good.
That's exactly why I called them theories. You're making confident conclusions about something none of us can actually know yet.
As for me, you're free to write whatever you want and spend your time and energy however you like. I just think it's a waste. Every time I check this thread, it's the same thing: people getting angry, insulting each other, and acting personally offended because an online creator changed how they run their business. Honestly, I find it more amusing than anything else.
I've seen exactly the same pattern in the B. Delph. thread and plenty of others. There are billions of women in the world, yet some people become emotionally attached to one creator and get genuinely upset because she isn't producing the content they want anymore. I just don't understand investing that much emotional energy into it. Life is too short for that. :WeSmart:
Even if you stay subscribed for a year without getting any new content, that's your choice. I think it's a ridiculous waste of time and money.
You could also spend $100 on a jar of B. Delph.'s "bathwater" Whether it was actually her bathwater or not is beside the point. If that's how someone wants to spend their money, that's their right. I'll still think it's ridiculous.:hahaa:
The same goes for spending your time building baseless theories and arguing about them in the comments.
ETTHEPEEPO:
We're talking about two completely different things. It feels like you're replying to an argument you invented instead of the one I actually made.
The problem is that you're presenting speculation as if it were an established fact.
Do you have any proof that she won't return to running the account herself? Because I haven't seen any.
She may have simply taken a temporary break, delegated the account while recovering after giving birth, and decided to come back later. That's just as plausible as your theory that she's gone for good.
That's exactly why I called them theories. You're making confident conclusions about something none of us can actually know yet.
As for me, you're free to write whatever you want and spend your time and energy however you like. I just think it's a waste. Every time I check this thread, it's the same thing: people getting angry, insulting each other, and acting personally offended because an online creator changed how they run their business. Honestly, I find it more amusing than anything else.
I've seen exactly the same pattern in the B. Delph. thread and plenty of others. There are billions of women in the world, yet some people become emotionally attached to one creator and get genuinely upset because she isn't producing the content they want anymore. I just don't understand investing that much emotional energy into it. Life is too short for that. :WeSmart:
Even if you stay subscribed for a year without getting any new content, that's your choice. I think it's a ridiculous waste of time and money.
You could also spend $100 on a jar of B. Delph.'s "bathwater" Whether it was actually her bathwater or not is beside the point. If that's how someone wants to spend their money, that's their right. I'll still think it's ridiculous.:hahaa:
The same goes for spending your time building baseless theories and arguing about them in the comments.
ETTHEPEEPO:
