
. You can't be this dense dude.
Stop with the mental gymnastics. It doesn't matter how you try to manipulate the definition of pornstar. "Traditional" does not mean anything because it doesn't modify "pornstar" in any way relevant to what you're trying to say.
A "traditional" pornstar literally cannot fit your incorrect definition of an OF/Fansly model for several reasons. One....because those are new generation ways of creating and selling porn. Both of those sites were created within the last decade and aren't "traditional" by any sense. The literal definition of the word "traditional" requires a longstanding established history, and subscription platforms simply haven't existed long enough to hold that title. You can't call a modern digital business model "traditional" when it disrupted the very system that created the term. Calling an OnlyFans creator a "traditional pornstar" is like calling a Twitch Streamer a "traditional broadcaster." They may both be entertaining people on a screen, but the entire infrastructure, business model, and relationship with the audience are completely different.
Again you do not know her personal finances and she in fact has more followers+sales than many models that are actually signed to an agency. Which ironically, contrary to your baseless assumption, allows her to keep all of her earnings vs those signed to an agency who have to pay them.
7K followers means nothing?



. For a creator with no social media advertising of any kind that means she's popular and has built a dedicated fanbase. Manyvids actually let's you see when a creator has sold videos and gained new paid subscriptions. Within the last week alone she had 3 or 4 at 50$ per pop and that's not even counting the actual videos sold in the last 7 days which was 25+

again stop pulling crap out your ass with no factual basis.
I never claimed it was her primary source. Im simply giving you several reasons why you can't automatically assume it isn't based on weak logic and reasoning.
You were 100% whiteknighting.
Please stop trying to define words based off your own interpretation.
Per Google: "Drip feeding" means supplying something—like information, money, or content—slowly and in small amounts over a period of time, rather than all at once"
Are you going to argue with Oxford and Google now?

You called me upset but are the only one throwing insults at people and rage typing trying to make a weak point with incorrect definitions and terms.
Stop bro. It's cringe.