Yeah, that's the guy. Couldnt remember his name. Prison for 32 years. Can't post a link but adult industry news has an article.
Sounds like he was a real abusive and manipulative piece of shit.
Not saying this guy is the same, just makes my spidey senses tingle to see him invite young girls over to his house to stay and fuck for a week. Seems like the kind of serious power imbalance which makes consent complicated IMHO.
Sounds like he was a real abusive and manipulative piece of shit.
Not saying this guy is the same, just makes my spidey senses tingle to see him invite young girls over to his house to stay and fuck for a week. Seems like the kind of serious power imbalance which makes consent complicated IMHO.
Indeed you can. I never liked the baby-faced filters Apollo used. Found them wildly creepy so didn't pay a huge amount of attention to his stuff even though I liked the premise.
What this guy is doing has such a massive potential for abuse that I don't know how I feel about it. In a fully consenting situation I like the kink, but I don't get off to women being abused.
He skirts the line with consent in a few videos I've seen (continuing to face fuck the blonde after she taps out for example). Bringing very young looking, seemingly naive women to your house under the expectation of having sex and making porn, having them sleep on your couch miles from home. Having them say shit like "you can do whatever you want to my body" is fine in a vacuum but do we really trust that he'll take no for an answer if consent is revoked? Tapping out is like safewording, it's not a "we'll stop in a minute when I've cum" situation. People with real kink experience understand that, but naive young women might not and don't know where that line between performance and abuse is.
Given he's putting them in a situation where revoking that consent could have consequence, is it even actually consent in the first place? Prisoners can't consent with prison guards due to the power imbalance. I don't think he's necessarily keeping them prisoner, but he could be exploiting the situation he created by putting them in a vulnerable position and that's definitely a problem.
What this guy is doing has such a massive potential for abuse that I don't know how I feel about it. In a fully consenting situation I like the kink, but I don't get off to women being abused.
He skirts the line with consent in a few videos I've seen (continuing to face fuck the blonde after she taps out for example). Bringing very young looking, seemingly naive women to your house under the expectation of having sex and making porn, having them sleep on your couch miles from home. Having them say shit like "you can do whatever you want to my body" is fine in a vacuum but do we really trust that he'll take no for an answer if consent is revoked? Tapping out is like safewording, it's not a "we'll stop in a minute when I've cum" situation. People with real kink experience understand that, but naive young women might not and don't know where that line between performance and abuse is.
Given he's putting them in a situation where revoking that consent could have consequence, is it even actually consent in the first place? Prisoners can't consent with prison guards due to the power imbalance. I don't think he's necessarily keeping them prisoner, but he could be exploiting the situation he created by putting them in a vulnerable position and that's definitely a problem.